↓ Skip to main content

Spatial variability and abiotic determinants of termite mounds throughout a savanna catchment

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial variability and abiotic determinants of termite mounds throughout a savanna catchment
Published in
Ecography, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/ecog.00532
Authors

Andrew B. Davies, Shaun R. Levick, Gregory P. Asner, Mark P. Robertson, Berndt J. van Rensburg, Catherine L. Parr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Colombia 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 39%
Environmental Science 44 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Philosophy 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,205,920
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,169
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,113
of 226,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.