| Title |
Intake of vegetables and fruit and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-014-0656-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bailing Li, Gengxi Jiang, Guanxin Zhang, Qing Xue, Hao Zhang, Chong Wang, Tiejun Zhao |
| Abstract |
To study the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), we summarized the evidence from observational studies in categorical and linear dose-response meta-analyses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,861,007
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,000
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,613
of 305,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.