You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Device-detected subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias: definition, implications and management-an European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLEACE).
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Europace, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/europace/eux163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bulent Gorenek, Jeroen Bax, Giuseppe Boriani, Shih-Ann Chen, Nikolaos Dagres, Taya V Glotzer, Jeff S Healey, Carsten W Israel, Gulmira Kudaiberdieva, Lars-Åke Levin, Gregory Y H Lip, David Martin, Ken Okumura, Jesper H Svendsen, Hung-Fat Tse, Giovanni L Botto, Christian Sticherling, Cecilia Linde, Valentina Kutyifa, Robert Bernat, Daniel Scherr, Chu-Pak Lau, Pedro Iturralde, Daniel P Morin, Irina Savelieva, Gregory Lip, Bulent Gorenek, Christian Sticherling, Laurent Fauchier, A. Goette, Werner Jung, Marc A Vos, Michele Brignole, Christian Elsner, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan, Francisco Marin, Giuseppe Boriani, Deirdre Lane, Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist, Irina Savelieva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 47% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 44% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,253,129
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#886
of 3,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,666
of 325,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.