| Title |
Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) as a model system in community, landscape and ecosystem ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0658-x |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Bowker, Fernando T. Maestre, David Eldridge, Jayne Belnap, Andrea Castillo-Monroy, Cristina Escolar, Santiago Soliveres |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 161 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 19% |
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,527,980
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#964
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,220
of 224,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#16
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.