You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Updating the OMERACT filter: implications for patient-reported outcomes.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Rheumatology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3899/jrheum.131312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John R Kirwan, Susan J Bartlett, Dorcas E Beaton, Maarten Boers, Ailsa Bosworth, Peter M Brooks, Ernest Choy, Maarten de Wit, Francis Guillemin, Sarah Hewlett, Tore K Kvien, Robert B Landewé, Amye L Leong, Anne Lyddiatt, Lyn March, James May, Pamela Lesley Montie, Enkeleida Nikaï, Pam Richards, Marieke M J H Voshaar, Wilma Smeets, Vibeke Strand, Peter Tugwell, Laure Gossec |
| Abstract |
At a previous Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meeting, participants reflected on the underlying methods of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument development. The participants requested proposals for more explicit instrument development protocols that would contribute to an enhanced version of the "Truth" statement in the OMERACT Filter, a widely used guide for outcome validation. In the present OMERACT session, we explored to what extent these new Filter 2.0 proposals were practicable, feasible, and already being applied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,014,336
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#3,202
of 3,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,388
of 236,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#54
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.