↓ Skip to main content

Specificity of inhibitory KIRs enables NK cells to detect changes in an altered peptide environment

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Specificity of inhibitory KIRs enables NK cells to detect changes in an altered peptide environment
Published in
Immunogenetics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00251-017-1019-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Carrillo-Bustamante, Rob J. de Boer, Can Keşmir

Abstract

The activity of natural killer (NK) cells is tightly regulated by inhibitory and activating receptors. Inhibitory killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (iKIRs) survey the surface of target cells by monitoring the expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I. The binding of iKIRs has been shown to be sensitive to the peptides presented by HLA class I, implying that iKIRs have the ability to detect the changes in the repertoire of peptide-HLA class I complexes (pHLA), a process occurring during viral infection and in tumor cells. To study how the pHLA repertoire changes upon infection, and whether an iKIR is able to detect these changes, we study peptides eluted from cells prior and after infection with measles virus (MV). Remarkably, most changes in the repertoire of potential iKIR ligands are predicted to be caused by the altered expression of self-peptides. We show that an iKIR can detect these changes in the presented peptides only if it is sufficiently specific, e.g., if iKIRs can distinguish between different amino acids in the contact residues (e.g., position 7 and 8). Our analysis further indicates that one single iKIR per host is not sufficient to detect changes in the peptide repertoire, suggesting that a multigene family encoding for different iKIRs is required for successful peptide recognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 43%
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,031,563
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#1,021
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,564
of 325,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.