↓ Skip to main content

The roles of MHC class II genes and post-translational modification in celiac disease

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
The roles of MHC class II genes and post-translational modification in celiac disease
Published in
Immunogenetics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00251-017-0985-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludvig M. Sollid

Abstract

Our increasing understanding of the etiology of celiac disease, previously considered a simple food hypersensitivity disorder caused by an immune response to cereal gluten proteins, challenges established concepts of autoimmunity. HLA is a chief genetic determinant, and certain HLA-DQ allotypes predispose to the disease by presenting posttranslationally modified (deamidated) gluten peptides to CD4(+) T cells. The deamidation of gluten peptides is mediated by transglutaminase 2. Strikingly, celiac disease patients generate highly disease-specific autoantibodies to the transglutaminase 2 enzyme. The dual role of transglutaminase 2 in celiac disease is hardly coincidental. This paper reviews the genetic mapping and involvement of MHC class II genes in disease pathogenesis, and discusses the evidence that MHC class II genes, via the involvement of transglutaminase 2, influence the generation of celiac disease-specific autoantibodies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 38 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#130
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,972
of 328,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.