↓ Skip to main content

Macroscopic and stereomicroscopic comparison of hacking trauma of bones before and after carbonization

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Macroscopic and stereomicroscopic comparison of hacking trauma of bones before and after carbonization
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1649-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique Alunni, Luísa Nogueira, Gérald Quatrehomme

Abstract

This experimental study examined lesions produced by a hatchet on pig femurs before and after carbonization. A total of 30 lesions were produced and analyzed using stereomicroscopy and then reexamined after carbonization. Not only was the sharp-blunt mechanism of the hacking trauma (V-shape, regularity of one edge, irregularity of the other edge, upraising, lateral pushing back, fossae dug laterally to the edge) still recognizable after carbonization; in some instances, the carbonization actually enhanced the features observed. Carbonization also did not significantly alter the measurements of the lesions. Carbonization tends to alter the structure of the bone especially in areas weakened by the blunt trauma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Unspecified 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,434,884
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#1,564
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,528
of 312,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#54
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.