↓ Skip to main content

Does the Genetic Cause of Prader-Willi Syndrome Explain the Highly Variable Phenotype?

Overview of attention for article published in Maedica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the Genetic Cause of Prader-Willi Syndrome Explain the Highly Variable Phenotype?
Published in
Maedica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine, September 2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreea-Iulia Dobrescu, Adela Chirita-Emandi, Nicoleta Andreescu, Simona Farcas, Maria Puiu

Abstract

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is characterized by extensive clinical and genetic variability caused by lack of expression of imprinted genes of the chromosomal region 15q11.2-q13. The genotye-phenotype correlation has not been yet fully elucidated. To analyze these correlations in order to determine the role of specifi c geneic alterations in the development of clinical symptoms in PWS. We retrospectively analyzed data routinely collected as part of the clinical care of 52 patients with clinical suspicion of PWS. FISH test was performed in all patients; in case of negative results, methylation test was performed. PWS was confi rmed in 35 patients that were divided in two groups according to the genetic cause of PWS: group A-21 patients with 15q11-q13 region deletion, mean age at evaluation 8.1 years (SD= 5.6) and mean of clinical score 9.4 ± 1.8; group B-14 patients with positive methylation test, with mean age at evaluation 6.7 years (SD= 4.6) and mean of clinical score 10.1 ± 1.9. Facial dysmorphism and neonatal hypotonia were present in all evaluated patients; while, higher frequency of major and minor PWS criteria were noted in the group A. Onset of hyperphagia, was around the age of 2 years in most patients, however one patient from group B had normal eating behavior and normal weight beyond age 5 years. In our study, the various genotypes did not seem to explain the diff erence in phenotype in PWS patients. We found a delayed time until diagnosis in these patients, although all had neonatal hypotonia and other suggestive phenotypic features, underlining once more the need for increased awareness of this syndrome, as well as easier accessibility to genetic counseling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,970,839
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Maedica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine
#193
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,261
of 349,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maedica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.