↓ Skip to main content

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Quantitation of Poly(ADP-Ribose) by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantification of PARP Activity in Human Tissues: Ex Vivo Assays in Blood Cells and Immunohistochemistry in Human Biopsies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Detecting and Quantifying pADPr In Vivo
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Compartment-Specific Poly-ADP-Ribose Formation as a Biosensor for Subcellular NAD Pools
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Cell Cycle Resolved Measurements of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Formation and DNA Damage Signaling by Quantitative Image-Based Cytometry
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Detecting Protein ADP-Ribosylation Using a Clickable Aminooxy Probe
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 ADP-Ribosylated Peptide Enrichment and Site Identification: The Phosphodiesterase-Based Method
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using Clickable NAD+ Analogs to Label Substrate Proteins of PARPs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Identification of Protein Substrates of Specific PARP Enzymes Using Analog-Sensitive PARP Mutants and a “Clickable” NAD+ Analog
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Identification of ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites on In Vitro Modified Proteins by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Proteome-Wide Identification of In Vivo ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling in DNA Repair
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methods to Assess the Role of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases in Regulating Mitochondrial Oxidation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Approaches for Investigating Translational Regulation Controlled by PARP1: Biotin-Based UV Cross-Linking and Luciferase Reporter Assay
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methodology to Identify Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase 1 (PARP1)–mRNA Targets by PAR-CLiP
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Biochemical and Biophysical Methods for Analysis of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 and Its Interactions with Chromatin
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 PARP-1 Interaction with and Activation by Histones and Nucleosomes
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Strategies Employed for the Development of PARP Inhibitors
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 High-Throughput Colorimetric Assay for Identifying PARP-1 Inhibitors Using a Large Small-Molecule Collection
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Testing PARP Inhibitors Using a Murine Xenograft Model
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 In Vitro Long-Term Proliferation Assays to Study Antiproliferative Effects of PARP Inhibitors on Cancer Cells
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Use of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity Assay to Determine the Specificity of PARP-1 Inhibitors
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 The Use of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Use as Adjuvant with Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy, Use as a Single Agent in Susceptible Patients, and Techniques Used to Identify Susceptible Patients
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Purification of Recombinant Human PARP-3
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Purification of Recombinant Human PARG and Activity Assays
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Studying Catabolism of Protein ADP-Ribosylation
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Purification of DNA Damage-Dependent PARPs from E. coli for Structural and Biochemical Analysis
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Identifying and Validating Tankyrase Binders and Substrates: A Candidate Approach
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Computational and Experimental Studies of ADP-Ribosylation
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Erratum to: Methodology to Identify Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase 1 (PARP1)–mRNA Targets by PAR-CLiP
Attention for Chapter 19: High-Throughput Colorimetric Assay for Identifying PARP-1 Inhibitors Using a Large Small-Molecule Collection
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-Throughput Colorimetric Assay for Identifying PARP-1 Inhibitors Using a Large Small-Molecule Collection
Chapter number 19
Book title
Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6993-7_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6992-0, 978-1-4939-6993-7
Authors

Kotova, Elena, Tulin, Alexei V., Elena Kotova, Alexei V. Tulin

Abstract

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP-1) protein became a popular target for treatment of several types of cancer. A number of PARP-1 inhibitors are currently in clinical trials. Most of them were designed competitors with NAD for a binding site on PARP-1 molecule. This strategy resulted in a discovery of mainly nucleotide-like PARP-1 inhibitors, which may target not only PARP-1 but also other pathways involving NAD and other nucleotides. Many cancer types demonstrate rapid development of resistance to NAD-like PARP-1 inhibitors. Thus, identification and characterization of new small molecules inhibit PARP-1 with high specificity and efficacy is important for the clinical research. We have proposed a new approach to screen libraries for new PARP-1 inhibitors based on histone H4-dependent PARP-1 activation. Beside identification of NAD competitors in a small molecules collection, this approach allows finding other classes of PARP-1 inhibitors that specifically disrupt H4-based PARP-1 activation or arrest inactive allosteric conformation of PARP-1. Here, we present an adaptation of this approach for a large-scale high-throughput screen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,905,157
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,270
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,223
of 312,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#134
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.