↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of intramyocardial blood volume with 99mTc-RBC SPECT-CT imaging: A preclinical study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of intramyocardial blood volume with 99mTc-RBC SPECT-CT imaging: A preclinical study
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12350-017-0970-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hassan Mohy-Ud-Din, Nabil E Boutagy, John C Stendahl, Zhen W Zhuang, Albert J Sinusas, Chi Liu

Abstract

Currently, there is no established non-invasive imaging approach to directly evaluate myocardial microcirculatory function in order to diagnose microvascular disease independent of co-existing epicardial disease. In this work, we developed a methodological framework for quantification of intramyocardial blood volume (IMBV) as a novel index of microcirculatory function with SPECT/CT imaging of (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cells (RBCs). Dual-gated myocardial SPECT/CT equilibrium imaging of (99m)Tc-RBCs was performed on twelve canines under resting conditions. Five correction schemes were studied: cardiac gating with no other corrections (CG), CG with attenuation correction (CG + AC), CG + AC with scatter correction (CG + AC + SC), dual cardiorespiratory gating with AC + SC (DG + AC + SC), and DG + AC + SC with partial volume correction (DG + AC + SC + PVC). Quantification of IMBV using each approach was evaluated in comparison to those obtained from all corrections. The in vivo SPECT estimates of IMBV values were validated against those obtained from ex vivo microCT imaging of the casted hearts. The estimated IMBV with all corrections was 0.15 ± 0.03 for the end-diastolic phase and 0.11 ± 0.03 for the end-systolic phase. The cycle-dependent change in IMBV (ΔIMBV) with all corrections was 23.9 ± 8.6%. Schemes that applied no correction or partial correction resulted in significant over-estimation of IMBV and significant under-underestimation of ΔIMBV. Estimates of IMBV and ΔIMBV using all corrections were consistent with values reported in the literature using invasive techniques. In vivo SPECT estimates of IMBV strongly correlated (R (2) ≥ 0.70) with ex vivo measures for the various correction schemes, while the fully corrected scheme yielded the smallest bias. Non-invasive quantification of IMBV is feasible using (99m)Tc-RBCs SPECT/CT imaging, however, requires full compensation of physical degradation factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,275,950
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#130
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,985
of 325,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.