↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the encoding properties of intraspinal mechanosensory neurons in the lamprey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of the encoding properties of intraspinal mechanosensory neurons in the lamprey
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00359-017-1196-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Massarelli, Allan L. Yau, Kathleen A. Hoffman, Tim Kiemel, Eric D. Tytell

Abstract

Proprioceptive sensory inputs are an integral part of the closed-loop system of locomotion. In the lamprey, a model organism for vertebrate locomotion, such sensory inputs come from intraspinal mechanosensory cells called "edge cells". These edge cells synapse directly onto interneurons in the spinal central pattern generator (CPG) circuit and allow the CPG to adjust the motor output according to how the body is bending. However, the encoding properties of the edge cells have never been fully characterized. To identify these properties and better understand edge cells' role in locomotion, we isolated spinal cords of silver lampreys (Ichthyomyzon unicuspis) and recorded extracellularly from the lateral tracts where edge cell axons are located. We identified cells that responded to mechanical stimuli and used standard spike sorting algorithms to identify separate units, then examined how the cells respond to bending rate and bending angle. Although some cells respond to the bending angle, as was previously known, the strongest and most common responses were to bending velocity. These encoding properties will help us better understand how lampreys and other basal vertebrates adapt their locomotor rhythms to different water flow patterns, perturbations, or other unexpected changes in their environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,677,380
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#396
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,587
of 313,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.