↓ Skip to main content

Caffeine withdrawal and high-intensity endurance cycling performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
52 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caffeine withdrawal and high-intensity endurance cycling performance
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, March 2011
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2010.541480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Irwin, Ben Desbrow, Aleisha Ellis, Brooke O'Keeffe, Gary Grant, Michael Leveritt

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of a controlled 4-day caffeine withdrawal period on the effect of an acute caffeine dose on endurance exercise performance. Twelve well-trained and familiarized male cyclists, who were caffeine consumers (from coffee and a range of other sources), were recruited for the study. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design was employed, involving four experimental trials. Participants abstained from dietary caffeine sources for 4 days before the trials and ingested capsules (one in the morning and one in the afternoon) containing either placebo or caffeine (1.5 mg · kg(-1) body weight · day(-1)). On day 5, capsules containing placebo or caffeine (3 mg · kg(-1) body weight) were ingested 90 min before completing a time trial, equivalent to one hour of cycling at 75% peak sustainable power output. Hence the study was designed to incorporate placebo-placebo, placebo-caffeine, caffeine-placebo, and caffeine-caffeine conditions. Performance time was significantly improved after acute caffeine ingestion by 1:49 ± 1:41 min (3.0%, P = 0.021) following a withdrawal period (placebo-placebo vs. placebo-caffeine), and by 2:07 ± 1:28 min (3.6%, P = 0.002) following the non-withdrawal period (caffeine-placebo vs. caffeine-caffeine). No significant difference was detected between the two acute caffeine trials (placebo-caffeine vs. caffeine-caffeine). Average heart rate throughout exercise was significantly higher following acute caffeine administration compared with placebo. No differences were observed in ratings of perceived exertion between trials. A 3 mg · kg(-1) dose of caffeine significantly improves exercise performance irrespective of whether a 4-day withdrawal period is imposed on habitual caffeine users.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 28%
Student > Master 48 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 95 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#989,361
of 25,019,109 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#344
of 3,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,471
of 114,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.