| Title |
Crocus sativus L. genomics and different DNA barcode applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Systematics and Evolution, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00606-013-0841-7 |
| Authors |
Angelo Gismondi, Federica Fanali, Juan Manuel Martínez Labarga, Maria Grilli Caiola, Antonella Canini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,424,392
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#53
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,757
of 197,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.