↓ Skip to main content

(書評)水林彪・大津透・新田一郎・大藤修編著「「法社会史」(新体系日本史2)」

Overview of attention for article published in Legal History Review, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(書評)水林彪・大津透・新田一郎・大藤修編著「「法社会史」(新体系日本史2)」
Published in
Legal History Review, January 2002
DOI 10.5955/jalha.2002.183
Authors

植田 信広

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,717,676
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Legal History Review
#5
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,553
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal History Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them