↓ Skip to main content

Final Results of Local-Regional Control and Late Toxicity of RTOG 9003: A Randomized Trial of Altered Fractionation Radiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Final Results of Local-Regional Control and Late Toxicity of RTOG 9003: A Randomized Trial of Altered Fractionation Radiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan J. Beitler, Qiang Zhang, Karen K. Fu, Andy Trotti, Sharon A. Spencer, Christopher U. Jones, Adam S. Garden, George Shenouda, Jonathan Harris, Kian K. Ang

Abstract

To test whether altered radiation fractionation schemes (hyperfractionation [HFX], accelerated fractionation, continuous [AFX-C], and accelerated fractionation with split [AFX-S]) improved local-regional control (LRC) rates for patients with squamous cell cancers (SCC) of the head and neck when compared with standard fractionation (SFX) of 70 Gy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 40 17%
Student > Postgraduate 31 13%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Master 21 9%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 53 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,447,814
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#467
of 11,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,162
of 239,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#6
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.