| Title |
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Affective Judgments and Physical Activity in Adult Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-009-9147-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan E. Rhodes, Bonnie Fiala, Mark Conner |
| Abstract |
Popular theories of health behavior have often been criticized for neglecting an affective component to behavioral engagement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 54 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 78 | 30% |
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,587,192
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#363
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,059
of 165,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.