↓ Skip to main content

Psychologic Distress Reduces Preoperative Self-assessment Scores in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychologic Distress Reduces Preoperative Self-assessment Scores in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3531-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Q. Potter, James D. Wylie, Grant S. Sun, James T. Beckmann, Stephen K. Aoki

Abstract

In several areas of orthopaedics, including spine and upper extremity surgery, patients with greater levels of psychologic distress report worse self-assessments of pain and function than patients who are not distressed. This effect can lead to lower than expected baseline scores on common patient-reported outcome scales, even those not traditionally considered to have a psychologic component.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,615,224
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,498
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,451
of 235,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#26
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.