You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High‐flow nasal cannula in bronchiolitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jpc.12509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Mayfield, Fiona Bogossian, Lee O'Malley, Andreas Schibler |
| Abstract |
To obtain data on the safety and clinical impact of managing infants with bronchiolitis on the ward with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 31% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 78 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,319,096
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#428
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,158
of 234,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.