↓ Skip to main content

Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms
Published in
Quality of Life Research, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11136-009-9560-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung W. Choi, Steven P. Reise, Paul A. Pilkonis, Ron D. Hays, David Cella

Abstract

Short-form patient-reported outcome measures are popular because they minimize patient burden. We assessed the efficiency of static short forms and computer adaptive testing (CAT) using data from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Turkey 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 9 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 22%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,515,537
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#280
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,001
of 165,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.