↓ Skip to main content

A simple heat alert system for Melbourne, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
A simple heat alert system for Melbourne, Australia
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0132-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neville Nicholls, Carol Skinner, Margaret Loughnan, Nigel Tapper

Abstract

A simple heat alert system, based solely on predicted maximum and minimum daily temperatures, has been developed for the city of Melbourne in southeast Australia. The system is based upon a demonstration that, when mean daily temperature exceeds a threshold of 30 degrees C (mean of today's maximum temperature and tonight's minimum temperature), the average daily mortality of people aged 65 years or more is about 15-17% greater than usual. Similar numbers of excess deaths also occur when daily minimum temperatures exceed 24 degrees C (increases of 19-21% over expected death rate), so a heat alert system based solely on this widely available weather forecast variable is also feasible. No strong signal of excess heat-related deaths appears when the data are stratified using daily maximum temperatures. This may be because in Melbourne some days with very high maximum temperatures will be affected by the passage of cool changes and cold fronts in the afternoon, leading to a rapid drop in temperature (i.e., some days with high maximum temperatures will not continue to be hot throughout the day and into the evening). A single day with temperatures exceeding the thresholds noted above is sufficient to cause this increase in mortality, rather than requiring an extended heat wave. The increased daily mortality does not appear to represent a short-term advancement of mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,329,142
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#107
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,797
of 167,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them