↓ Skip to main content

The economics of exhaustible resources

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The economics of exhaustible resources
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, March 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02464433
Authors

Harold Hotelling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Student > Master 20 28%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 40%
Environmental Science 10 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2010.
All research outputs
#5,870,291
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#190
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,539
of 17,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.