↓ Skip to main content

Towards an Integrated Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Species to Climate Change

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
871 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1801 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards an Integrated Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of Species to Climate Change
Published in
PLoS Biology, December 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen E Williams, Luke P Shoo, Joanne L Isaac, Ary A Hoffmann, Gary Langham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 27 1%
United Kingdom 14 <1%
Brazil 12 <1%
Canada 9 <1%
South Africa 8 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Other 45 2%
Unknown 1666 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 395 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 384 21%
Student > Master 267 15%
Student > Bachelor 184 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 76 4%
Other 298 17%
Unknown 197 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 898 50%
Environmental Science 438 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 60 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 2%
Social Sciences 24 1%
Other 72 4%
Unknown 265 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#909,447
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,604
of 9,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,029
of 183,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.