Title |
Interannual variability of deep convection in the Northwestern Mediterranean simulated with a coupled AORCM
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climate Dynamics, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-012-1527-5 |
Authors |
Blandine L’Hévéder, Laurent Li, Florence Sevault, Samuel Somot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 32% |
Researcher | 14 | 26% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,864,837
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,752
of 4,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,928
of 170,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#23
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.