| Title |
The Processing and Impact of Dissolved Riverine Nitrogen in the Arctic Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12237-011-9417-3 |
| Authors |
Suzanne E. Tank, Manfredi Manizza, Robert Max Holmes, James W. McClelland, Bruce J. Peterson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 41 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,003,541
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#407
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,881
of 130,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.