↓ Skip to main content

An arthroscopic technique to treat the iliotibial band syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
An arthroscopic technique to treat the iliotibial band syndrome
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00167-008-0660-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Michels, S. Jambou, M. Allard, V. Bousquet, P. Colombet, C. de Lavigne

Abstract

Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is an overuse injury mainly affecting runners. The initial treatment is conservative. Only, in recalcitrant cases surgery is indicated. Several open techniques have been described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of a standardized arthroscopic technique for treatment of a resistant ITBS. Thirty-six athletes with a resistant ITBS were treated with a standardized arthroscopic technique, limited to the resection of lateral synovial recess. Thirty-three patients were available for follow-up (mean 2 years 4 months). Thirty-two patients (34 knees) had good or excellent results. All patients went back to sports after 3 months. In two patients a meniscal lesion was found, which required treatment. One patient with only a fair result had associated cartilage lesions of the femoral condyle. Our results show that arthroscopic treatment of resistant ITBS is a valid option with a consistently good outcome. In addition, this arthroscopic approach allows excluding or treating other intra-articular pathology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,515,537
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#402
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,536
of 92,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.