↓ Skip to main content

Lifetime Cost of Abusive Head Trauma at Ages 0–4, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Lifetime Cost of Abusive Head Trauma at Ages 0–4, USA
Published in
Prevention Science, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11121-017-0815-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ted R. Miller, Ryan Steinbeigle, Bruce A. Lawrence, Cora Peterson, Curtis Florence, Marilyn Barr, Ronald G. Barr

Abstract

This paper aims to estimate lifetime costs resulting from abusive head trauma (AHT) in the USA and the break-even effectiveness for prevention. A mathematical model incorporated data from Vital Statistics, the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database, and previous studies. Unit costs were derived from published sources. From society's perspective, discounted lifetime cost of an AHT averages $5.7 million (95% CI $3.2-9.2 million) for a death. It averages $2.6 million (95% CI $1.0-2.9 million) for a surviving AHT victim including $224,500 for medical care and related direct costs (2010 USD). The estimated 4824 incident AHT cases in 2010 had an estimated lifetime cost of $13.5 billion (95% CI $5.5-16.2 billion) including $257 million for medical care, $552 million for special education, $322 million for child protective services/criminal justice, $2.0 billion for lost work, and $10.3 billion for lost quality of life. Government sources paid an estimated $1.3 billion. Out-of-pocket benefits of existing prevention programming would exceed its costs if it prevents 2% of cases. When a child survives AHT, providers and caregivers can anticipate a lifetime of potentially costly and life-threatening care needs. Better effectiveness estimates are needed for both broad prevention messaging and intensive prevention targeting high-risk caregivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Psychology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,163,939
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#130
of 1,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,838
of 319,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.