| Title |
The efficacy of intermittent cervical traction in patents with chronic neck pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Rheumatology, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10067-008-0895-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pinar Borman, Dilek Keskin, Betul Ekici, Hatice Bodur |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,936,111
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#379
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,235
of 96,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.