| Title |
Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-009-0183-2 |
| Authors |
Biswajeet Pradhan, Saro Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 70 | 27% |
| Engineering | 65 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,216,698
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#100
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,693
of 94,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them