↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoids and Gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 4,017)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
316 X users
patent
11 patents
facebook
1114 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
48 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Cannabinoids and Gliomas
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12035-007-0002-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Velasco, Arkaitz Carracedo, Cristina Blázquez, Mar Lorente, Tania Aguado, Amador Haro, Cristina Sánchez, Ismael Galve-Roperh, Manuel Guzmán

Abstract

Cannabinoids, the active components of Cannabis sativa L., act in the body by mimicking endogenous substances--the endocannabinoids--that activate specific cell surface receptors. Cannabinoids exert various palliative effects in cancer patients. In addition, cannabinoids inhibit the growth of different types of tumor cells, including glioma cells, in laboratory animals. They do so by modulating key cell signaling pathways, mostly the endoplasmic reticulum stress response, thereby inducing antitumoral actions such as the apoptotic death of tumor cells and the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Of interest, cannabinoids seem to be selective antitumoral compounds, as they kill glioma cells, but not their non-transformed astroglial counterparts. On the basis of these preclinical findings, a pilot clinical study of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme has been recently run. The good safety profile of THC, together with its possible growth-inhibiting action on tumor cells, justifies the setting up of future trials aimed at evaluating the potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 136 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 24%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Professor 12 8%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 624. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#36,396
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 4,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 79,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.