↓ Skip to main content

Apoptosis-inducing ability of silver(I) cyanide-phosphines useful for anti-cancer studies

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,026)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Apoptosis-inducing ability of silver(I) cyanide-phosphines useful for anti-cancer studies
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10616-017-0070-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zelinda Human-Engelbrecht, Reinout Meijboom, Marianne J. Cronjé

Abstract

Metal-based drugs have shown early promise as anticancer agents suggesting the potential application of silver(I) complexes as apoptosis-inducing agents. The ability of a silver(I) cyanide containing phosphine complex to induce cell death was evaluated in both a malignant (SNO esophageal cancer) and non-malignant (HDF-a skin and HEK293 kidney) cell lines. A dose-dependent decrease in cell viability was observed in the SNO cells. Light microscopy revealed morphological features indicative of apoptotic cell death. The mode of cell death was confirmed as apoptosis by phosphatidylserine externalization, DNA fragmentation and nuclear condensation. Furthermore, both the non-malignant cell lines showed morphological features indicative of apoptosis when exposed to complex 1. We propose the use of this silver(I) cyanide phosphine complex as an highly effective positive apoptosis control for use in anticancer studies of phosphine complexes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Chemistry 3 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#605,018
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#4
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,458
of 427,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.