↓ Skip to main content

Assumptions and moral understanding of the wish to hasten death: a philosophical review of qualitative studies

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Assumptions and moral understanding of the wish to hasten death: a philosophical review of qualitative studies
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11019-017-9785-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Rodríguez-Prat, Evert van Leeuwen

Abstract

It is not uncommon for patients with advanced disease to express a wish to hasten death (WTHD). Qualitative studies of the WTHD have found that such a wish may have different meanings, none of which can be understood outside of the patient's personal and sociocultural background, or which necessarily imply taking concrete steps to ending one's life. The starting point for the present study was a previous systematic review of qualitative studies of the WTHD in advanced patients. Here we analyse in greater detail the statements made by patients included in that review in order to examine their moral understandings and representations of illness, the dying process and death. We identify and discuss four classes of assumptions: (1) assumptions related to patients' moral understandings in terms of dignity, autonomy and authenticity; (2) assumptions related to social interactions; (3) assumptions related to the value of life; and (4) assumptions related to medicalisation as an overarching context within which the WTHD is expressed. Our analysis shows how a philosophical perspective can add to an understanding of the WTHD by taking into account cultural and anthropological aspects of the phenomenon. We conclude that the knowledge gained through exploring patients' experience and moral understandings in the end-of-life context may serve as the basis for care plans and interventions that can help them experience their final days as a meaningful period of life, restoring some sense of personal dignity in those patients who feel this has been lost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 21 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Psychology 8 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,268,646
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#160
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,407
of 319,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.