↓ Skip to main content

Objectivity and a comparison of methodological scenario approaches for climate change research

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Objectivity and a comparison of methodological scenario approaches for climate change research
Published in
Synthese, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0353-6
Authors

Elisabeth A. Lloyd, Vanessa J. Schweizer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 18%
Environmental Science 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Philosophy 5 7%
Engineering 5 7%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,204,266
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#171
of 2,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,002
of 216,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.