Title |
Grouping Practices in New Zealand Mathematics Classrooms: Where Are We at and Where Should We Be?
|
---|---|
Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40841-016-0054-z |
Authors |
Glenda Anthony, Roberta Hunter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Lecturer | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 13 | 16% |
Mathematics | 8 | 10% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,799,923
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies
#41
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,167
of 335,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.