↓ Skip to main content

A Simplified Method for Management of Platysmal Bands: Platysmotomy as an Office Procedure

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A Simplified Method for Management of Platysmal Bands: Platysmotomy as an Office Procedure
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00266-017-0934-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed M. Hegazy, Mohammed Farouk

Abstract

Restoration of the esthetic neck contour is an integral component of facial rejuvenation. Characters of the aging neck include lipodystrophy, platysmal bands and jowls that extend into the neck, reducing the esthetic characters of the lower face. The authors present a new, simplified and economic method to manage platysmal bands as an office procedure under local anesthesia using a standard 18-gauge syringe needle as a cutting tool. The new technique was used on a selected group of female patients classified as non-surgical cases according to Rorich classification. Twenty-five female patients shared in this study, with a follow-up period standardized to 1 year; one patient showed up after 1.5 years with preserved esthetic outcome. One patient showed residual band managed by recutting immediately after bruising and edema resolved. The technique was proven safe regarding important neurovascular structures of the neck. Patients gave no negative comments regarding results of surgery. Kappa statistical analysis showed perfect interobserver agreement between patients and an independent assessor. The authors concluded that the studied new technique is safe, effective, and valuable for management of platysmal bands in a selected group of patients. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Unspecified 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,469,838
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#711
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,718
of 312,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.