↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Clinical Neurosciences in a Psychiatry Residency Training Program: A Brief Report with Pilot Data

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Integrating Clinical Neurosciences in a Psychiatry Residency Training Program: A Brief Report with Pilot Data
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40596-017-0756-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Cookey, Michael Butterfield, Celia Robichaud, David Lovas

Abstract

A novel neuroscience curriculum was developed attempting to address the growing consensus that increased attention be given to incorporating clinical neuroscience in psychiatric residencies. Eight 2-h sessions delivered over 2 academic years were incorporated into the teaching curriculum at one institution in which residents participated in case-based clinical neuroscience learning. Each session utilized multimodal teaching methods facilitated by two senior psychiatry residents with support from a faculty mentor. A survey assessing resident comfort with clinical neurosciences was gathered over four timepoints during the 2-year period. There were 69 attendees in total across the four time points, with a 100% response rate to the surveys. There was a significant overall effect found, F(3,16) = 12.64, p < .01, on resident comfort level between the four timepoints. There was a significant increase in comfort level at the third timepoint compared to the first two timepoints; however, there was a notable drop in comfort level between the third and fourth timepoint such that there was no statistically significant difference between the first and last timepoint. Nevertheless, despite mixed positive and negative responses on qualitative analysis, all residents supported the continuation of the course. Resident comfort level did not change appreciably with this curriculum; however, there was unanimous support for the continuation of the course in future years. Incorporating this type of curriculum is feasible in a medium-sized psychiatry residency program. Given that subjective comfort ratings are not indicative of actual competency, future work should include objective, competency-based outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,560,904
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#1,048
of 1,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,460
of 315,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.