↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of regional project to strengthen national health research systems in four countries in West Africa: lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of regional project to strengthen national health research systems in four countries in West Africa: lessons learned
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12961-017-0214-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Issiaka Sombié, Jude Aidam, Gabriela Montorzi

Abstract

Since the Commission on Health Research for Development (COHRED) published its flagship report, more attention has been focused on strengthening national health research systems (NHRS). This paper evaluates the contribution of a regional project that used a participatory approach to strengthen NHRS in four post-conflict West African countries - Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Mali. The data from the situation analysis conducted at the start of the project was compared to data from the project's final evaluation, using a hybrid conceptual framework built around four key areas identified through the analysis of existing frameworks. The four areas are governance and management, capacities, funding, and dissemination/use of research findings. The project helped improve the countries' governance and management mechanisms without strengthening the entire NHRS. In the four countries, at least one policy, plan or research agenda was developed. One country put in place a national health research ethics committee, while all four countries could adopt a research information management system. The participatory approach and support from the West African Health Organisation and COHRED were all determining factors. The lessons learned from this project show that the fragile context of these countries requires long-term engagement and that support from a regional institution is needed to address existing challenges and successfully strengthen the entire NHRS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,558,380
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#658
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,674
of 312,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.