| Title |
Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, July 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02246140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. A. Wise, K. Leeb, D. Pocock, P. Newton, B. Burnette, J. B. Justice |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 21% |
| Psychology | 17 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,289
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,482
of 23,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.