↓ Skip to main content

Intrawound application of vancomycin changes the responsible germ in elective spine surgery without significant effect on the rate of infection: a randomized prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Intrawound application of vancomycin changes the responsible germ in elective spine surgery without significant effect on the rate of infection: a randomized prospective study
Published in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12306-017-0490-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Mirzashahi, M. Chehrassan, S. M. J. Mortazavi

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a costly complication associated with spine surgery. The impact of intrawound vancomycin has not been strongly postulated to decrease the risk of surgical site infection. We designed study to determine whether intrawound vancomycin application reduces the risk of SSI in patients after spine surgery. A prospective randomized control trial study to evaluate the patients with elective spine surgery in a period of 15 month was designed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether intrawound vancomycin was applied or not. The relative risk of SSI within postoperative 30 days was evaluated. Three hundred and eighty patients were included in this study: degenerative spine pathologies and tumor 80% (304), trauma 11% (42) and deformity 9% (34). Intrawound vancomycin was used in 51% of patients. Prevalence of SSI was 2.7% in the absence of vancomycin use versus 5.2% with intrawound vancomycin. In multivariable regression model, those with higher number of levels exposed, postoperative ICU admission and obesity and use of instrumentation more than two levels had higher risk of developing SSI. In the treatment group Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20%) were the most common pathogens. In control group, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter (40%) were the most common organisms. Intrawound application of vancomycin after elective spine surgery was not associated with reduced risk of SSI and return to OR associated with SSI in our patients. However, the use of intrawound vancomycin changed the responsible infection germ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
#69
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,438
of 315,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.