↓ Skip to main content

hnRNP A3 binds to GGGGCC repeats and is a constituent of p62-positive/TDP43-negative inclusions in the hippocampus of patients with C9orf72 mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
hnRNP A3 binds to GGGGCC repeats and is a constituent of p62-positive/TDP43-negative inclusions in the hippocampus of patients with C9orf72 mutations
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1088-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohji Mori, Sven Lammich, Ian R. A. Mackenzie, Ignasi Forné, Sonja Zilow, Hans Kretzschmar, Dieter Edbauer, Jonathan Janssens, Gernot Kleinberger, Marc Cruts, Jochen Herms, Manuela Neumann, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Thomas Arzberger, Christian Haass

Abstract

Genetic analysis revealed the hexanucleotide repeat expansion GGGGCC within the regulatory region of the gene C9orf72 as the most common cause of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the second most common cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Since repeat expansions might cause RNA toxicity via sequestration of RNA-binding proteins, we searched for proteins capable of binding to GGGGCC repeats. In vitro-transcribed biotinylated RNA containing hexanucleotide GGGGCC or, as control, AAAACC repeats were incubated with nuclear protein extracts. Using stringent filtering protocols 20 RNA-binding proteins with a variety of different functions in RNA metabolism, translation and transport were identified. A subset of these proteins was further investigated by immunohistochemistry in human autopsy brains. This revealed that hnRNP A3 formed neuronal cytoplasmic and intranuclear inclusions in the hippocampus of patients with C9orf72 repeat extensions. Confocal microcopy showed that these inclusions belong to the group of the so far enigmatic p62-positive/TDP-43 negative inclusions characteristically seen in autopsy cases of diseased C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers. Thus, we have identified one protein component of these pathognomonic inclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 27%
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Student > Master 36 12%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 19%
Neuroscience 40 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 11%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,776,077
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,080
of 2,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,201
of 283,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.