↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise and Self-Care for Chronic Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise and Self-Care for Chronic Heart Failure
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip A. Ades, Steven J. Keteyian, Gary J. Balady, Nancy Houston-Miller, Dalane W. Kitzman, Donna M. Mancini, Michael W. Rich

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is highly prevalent in older individuals and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, hospitalizations, and disability. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) exercise training and CHF self-care counseling have each been shown to improve clinical status and clinical outcomes in CHF. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of CR exercise training alone (without counseling) have demonstrated consistent improvements in CHF symptoms in addition to reductions in cardiac mortality and number of hospitalizations, although individual trials have been less conclusive of the latter 2 findings. The largest single trial, HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training), showed a reduction in the adjusted risk for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 0.99; p = 0.03). Quality of life and mental depression also improved. CHF-related counseling, whether provided in isolation or in combination with CR exercise training, improves clinical outcomes and reduces CHF-related hospitalizations. We review current evidence on the benefits and risks of CR and self-care counseling in patients with CHF, provide recommendations for patient selection for third-party payers, and discuss the role of CR in promoting self-care and behavioral changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 378 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 101 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 19%
Sports and Recreations 27 7%
Psychology 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 107 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,112,286
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#350
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,962
of 225,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.