↓ Skip to main content

Feature Component-Based Extreme Learning Machines for Finger Vein Recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Computation, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Feature Component-Based Extreme Learning Machines for Finger Vein Recognition
Published in
Cognitive Computation, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12559-014-9254-3
Authors

Shan Juan Xie, Sook Yoon, Jucheng Yang, Yu Lu, Dong Sun Park, Bin Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 37%
Engineering 4 15%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,367,612
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Computation
#219
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,901
of 221,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Computation
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.