↓ Skip to main content

Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
791 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1514 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities
Published in
GeoJournal, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y
Authors

Peter H. Verburg, Paul P. Schot, Martin J. Dijst, A. Veldkamp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 2%
Germany 7 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Other 32 2%
Unknown 1417 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 349 23%
Student > Master 267 18%
Researcher 228 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 94 6%
Student > Bachelor 75 5%
Other 257 17%
Unknown 244 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 461 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 196 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 9%
Engineering 124 8%
Social Sciences 104 7%
Other 172 11%
Unknown 321 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#23,381,499
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#855
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,731
of 155,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.