↓ Skip to main content

Counting what really counts? Assessing the political impact of science

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Technology Transfer, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Counting what really counts? Assessing the political impact of science
Published in
The Journal of Technology Transfer, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10961-017-9605-9
Authors

A. Gaunand, L. Colinet, P.-B. Joly, M. Matt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 2 5%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 24 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,905,157
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#474
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,309
of 312,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.