↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of QoL5 for clinical databases. A short, global and generic questionnaire based on an integrated theory of the quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of QoL5 for clinical databases. A short, global and generic questionnaire based on an integrated theory of the quality of life
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, October 2003
DOI 10.1080/11024150252884331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jes S Lindholt, Søren Ventegodt, Eskild W Henneberg

Abstract

To develop and validate a short, global, and generic quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for clinical databases. The construct validity and item weighting of existing questionnaires are increasingly questioned.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 11 30%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#5,747
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,461
of 56,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#130
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.