| Title |
Heart rate variability during exertional heat stress: effects of heat production and treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-013-2804-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas D. Flouris, Andrea Bravi, Heather E. Wright-Beatty, Geoffrey Green, Andrew J. Seely, Glen P. Kenny |
| Abstract |
We assessed the efficacy of different treatments (i.e., treatment with ice water immersion vs. natural recovery) and the effect of exercise intensities (i.e., low vs. high) for restoring heart rate variability (HRV) indices during recovery from exertional heat stress (EHS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,318
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,330
of 318,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.