You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik Hedman, Gerhard Andersson, Brjánn Ljótsson, Erik Andersson, Christian Rück, Ewa Mörtberg, Nils Lindefors |
| Abstract |
Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) is an effective, well-established, but not widely available treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has the potential to increase availability and facilitate dissemination of therapeutic services for SAD. However, ICBT for SAD has not been directly compared with in-person treatments such as CBGT and few studies investigating ICBT have been conducted in clinical settings. Our aim was to investigate if ICBT is at least as effective as CBGT for SAD when treatments are delivered in a psychiatric setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 417 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 15% |
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 236 | 55% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,701,923
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,679
of 201,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,968
of 110,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#169
of 1,452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.