↓ Skip to main content

Daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention: a longitudinal study of college-aged women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,144)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention: a longitudinal study of college-aged women
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10865-017-9870-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane L. Rosenbaum, Hallie M. Espel, Meghan L. Butryn, Fengqing Zhang, Michael R. Lowe

Abstract

Daily self-weighing has been suggested as an important factor for weight loss maintenance among samples with obesity. This study is a secondary analysis that examined daily self-weighing in association with weight and body composition outcomes over 2 years among young women with vulnerability for weight gain. Women (N = 294) of varying weight status completed self-weighing frequency questionnaires and weight was measured in the clinic at baseline, 6 months, 1, and 2 years; DXA scans were completed at baseline, 6 months and 2 years. Multilevel models examined the relationship between daily self-weighing (at any point in the study) and trajectories of BMI and body fat percentage. Daily self-weighing was associated with significant declines in BMI and body fat percent over time. Future research is needed to examine causal relations between daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention. Nonetheless, these data extend the possibility that daily self-weighing may be important for prevention of unwanted weight gain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#168,111
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#16
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,624
of 317,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them