↓ Skip to main content

The politics and management of public expectations: Gaps, vacuums, clouding and the 2012 mayoral referenda

Overview of attention for article published in British Politics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The politics and management of public expectations: Gaps, vacuums, clouding and the 2012 mayoral referenda
Published in
British Politics, November 2013
DOI 10.1057/bp.2013.25
Authors

Katharine Dommett, Matthew Flinders

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 63%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,404,726
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from British Politics
#207
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,766
of 214,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Politics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.