↓ Skip to main content

Effect of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure on total mortality and hospitalization: an individual patient meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure on total mortality and hospitalization: an individual patient meta-analysis
Published in
European Heart Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard W. Troughton, Christopher M. Frampton, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Matthias Pfisterer, Luc W.M. Eurlings, Hans Erntell, Hans Persson, Christopher M. O'Connor, Deddo Moertl, Patric Karlström, Ulf Dahlström, Hanna K. Gaggin, James L. Januzzi, Rudolf Berger, A. Mark Richards, Yigal M. Pinto, M. Gary Nicholls

Abstract

Natriuretic peptide-guided (NP-guided) treatment of heart failure has been tested against standard clinically guided care in multiple studies, but findings have been limited by study size. We sought to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of NP-guided treatment of heart failure on all-cause mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 17%
Other 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 42 26%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 45 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,336,248
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#1,874
of 9,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,514
of 221,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#13
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.